The quiet coastal town of Wells, Maine, is grappling with a contentious issue that’s sparking heated debate and raising serious questions about community trust and civil liberties. The Wells Police Department’s agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) – specifically, their participation in the 287(g) Task Force Model program – is at the heart of the controversy.
A Contract Under Scrutiny
The 287(g) program allows local law enforcement agencies to perform certain immigration enforcement duties, often involving collaboration with ICE. However, the details of the Wells agreement have ignited concerns among residents and activists, with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Maine leading the charge against the partnership.
The ACLU’s Concerns: A Legal Gray Area
ACLU staff attorney Anahita Sotoohi has been a vocal critic of the agreement. Following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, the ACLU obtained the contract, revealing a troubling reality. The document, Sotoohi explained, grants participating agencies the power to interrogate, arrest, and detain non-legal residents – a power that goes beyond typical law enforcement duties.
“This is really destabilizing and threatening for immigrant communities,” Sotoohi warned during a recent public statement. The key issue lies in the concept of “detainers.” While Police Chief Jo-Ann Putnam previously stated the department would only detain individuals with a federal warrant, Sotoohi clarified that detainers are separate documents issued by ICE themselves, requesting local law enforcement to hold someone in the country illegally without a judge’s authorization. This creates a significant legal gray area, potentially leading to arrests based on ICE requests rather than established criminal charges.
Differing Perspectives in Wells
The debate in Wells is far from settled. While some residents support the agreement, citing the need to maintain a “family-friendly character” and enhance public safety, others are deeply concerned about the potential for eroding trust between law enforcement and the town’s immigrant population. The cost of these local enforcement responsibilities, funded by taxpayer dollars, is also a significant point of contention.
Unanswered Questions
As of Wednesday evening, Police Chief Jo-Ann Putnam had not yet responded to media inquiries. However, her previous statements emphasized the agreement’s intended use for officer training and the department’s commitment to adhering to federal authorization requirements.
The Future of the Agreement
The Wells Select Board has yet to make a decision regarding the agreement’s future. The situation remains fluid, highlighting a complex intersection of local law enforcement, federal immigration policy, and community concerns.
Sourced from https://www.newscentermaine.com/
Read the Source Report written by Pearl Small.
Additional Details: